Amanda Brown
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Monteiro | 2 | 2 | 4 | Nov 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Sara Gomer | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 17, 1985 | H2H |
| Annabel Croft | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 18, 1985 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 22, 1984 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 27, 1984 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Amanda Brown holds a 4–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amanda Brown leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Brown won the 1985 Melbourne round of 16 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Brown | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Sara Gomer | Match data | May 17, 1985* | R16 | Melbourne | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Amanda Brown | 6-2 6-3 | Sara Gomer | Match data | May 1, 1982* | QF | Hampstad | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Amanda Brown | 6-0 6-1 | Sara Gomer | Match data | Apr 24, 1982* | QF | West Worthing | WTA 250 | — |
| Amanda Brown | 6-3 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data | Apr 11, 1981* | SF | Norwich | WTA 250 | — |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Brown | — | — | — | 1,653 | 48 | 55 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 105 | 132 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Brown | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 12–4 | 75.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Amanda Brown | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1983 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 11 | 19 | 30 | 36.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | 47 | 57 | 104 | 45.2% | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 32 | 39 | 71 | 45.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Amanda Brown | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1476 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 1560 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.7% | +1.15 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.47 | 1980 | 1519 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.7% | +0.83 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1635 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -58 | — | 73.5% | +2.32 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +2.21 | 1981 | 1517 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.5% | -0.09 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.6 | +0.09 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1596 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | -21 | — | -2 | 38.1% | -0.79 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.6 | +0.68 | 1982 | 1545 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | 60.0% | +0.55 | — | 2–0 | — | +1.20 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1611 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -60 | -13 | +27 | 44.6% | -0.58 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 103.1 | +1.65 | 1983 | 1532 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +22 | 40.0% | -0.92 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.8 | +0.59 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1578 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | -9 | — | -25 | 29.3% | -1.41 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | -0.07 | 1984 | 1511 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | 26.7% | -1.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.16 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1556 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 | 1985 | 1568 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | — | +24 | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.6 | +1.64 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1660 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -213 | -39 | 46.9% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.62 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1680 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -6 | 46.3% | -0.39 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.2 | -0.33 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1747 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | -34 | 53.7% | +0.15 | 6–4 (60%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.3 | -0.39 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1639 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -117 | +78 | 43.5% | -0.78 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.51 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1636 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +106 | 42.4% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | +0.82 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1661 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -33 | — | +111 | 40.4% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–3 (0%) | 97.6 | -1.11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1557 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -82 | — | 34.4% | -1.06 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.9 | +1.43 |
| Career | — | 1654 | 115.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -36 | +1 | 46.7% | -0.16 | 12–13 (48%) | 13–8 (62%) | 102.5 | +5.05 | — | 1779 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -99 | +25 | 45.3% | -0.39 | 32–35 (48%) | 31–30 (51%) | 102.3 | +1.79 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Monteiro | 2 | 2 | 4 | Nov 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Sara Gomer | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 17, 1985 | H2H |
| Annabel Croft | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 18, 1985 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 22, 1984 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 27, 1984 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |