H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Alexandra Stevenson H2H: 1-1

Amanda Coetzer and Alexandra Stevenson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexandra Stevenson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 16 6-1 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Alexandra Stevenson
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #17 6-1 5-7 7-5 Alexandra Stevenson #32 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alexandra Stevenson #49 4-6 6-0 7-6(3) Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data Feb 1, 2002* R16 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Alexandra Stevenson #805 #18 1,444 1,844 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Alexandra Stevenson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #371 1,496 0 0
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #394 1,475 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1998 3–7 30.0% #132 1,477 0 0
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1999 13–11 54.2% #45 1,673 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 2000 9–24 27.3% #92 1,520 0 0
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 2001 15–15 50.0% #60 1,672 0 0
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 2002 31–24 56.4% #18 1,835 0 0
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 2003 13–26 33.3% #81 1,609 0 0
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 2004 0–7 0.0% #287 1,514 0 0
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #643 1,507 0 0
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 2006 0–4 0.0% #398 1,463 0 0
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 2008 1–1 50.0% #211 1,475 0 0
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 2009 0–2 0.0% #218 1,447 0 0
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 2011 1–3 25.0% #269 1,441 0 0
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Alexandra Stevenson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 4 11 15 26.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2002 23 16 39 59.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2006 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 48 75 123 39.0% 7 21 28 25.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1497 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.12
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1997 1475 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.30
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21 1998 1478 103.0 — — — — +11 — — 36.4% -1.05 0–2 0–1 — +0.97
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1999 1674 132.4 — — — — -104 — +100 49.1% -0.36 8–1 (89%) 5–1 (83%) 112.3 -1.46
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 2000 1521 121.1 — — — — +12 -47 +192 32.9% -1.27 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.1 +0.34
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 2001 1673 133.8 — — — — -28 -210 +89 53.1% +0.08 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -1.23
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 2002 1836 146.6 — — — — +21 -391 -146 53.7% +0.15 14–10 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 109.1 +0.07
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 2003 1610 118.0 +0.40 -2.78 0.731 44.9% +56 -204 +23 38.1% -0.79 4–8 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 94.0 +2.32
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 2004 1514 94.8 -0.12 -2.43 0.700 42.9% +34 — — 17.6% -2.30 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.16
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 2005 1507 101.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.06
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 2006 1464 99.6 -2.52 -4.98 0.569 40.6% +19 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.13
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 2008 1476 106.2 +1.20 +0.54 0.922 47.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 2009 1448 97.2 -2.56 -1.28 0.756 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.14
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 2011 1441 97.3 -2.94 -0.45 0.899 47.3% — — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.07
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1430 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1416 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 1845 131.9 -1.29 -2.25 0.745 44.3% +9 -164 +56 42.6% -0.60 33–35 (49%) 34–26 (57%) 106.1 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.