H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-0
Amanda Coetzer holds a 2–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1995 Brighton fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1995* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 16, 1994* | Prague | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Amanda Coetzer | 6-1 7-6 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amanda Coetzer | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |