H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 1-0

Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1990 Albuquerque fourth round 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 1990* Albuquerque WTA 250 R16 Hard Amanda Coetzer #56 6-3 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6