H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Debbie Graham H2H: 4-1

Amanda Coetzer holds a 4–1 lead over Debbie Graham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1996 Key Biscayne second round 6-4 6-3.

RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amanda Coetzer #15 6-4 6-3 Debbie Graham #188 Match data
Oct 31, 1992* San Juan WTA 250 QF Hard Debbie Graham #64 6-2 3-6 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #20 Match data
Sep 30, 1992* Taipei WTA 250 QF Hard Amanda Coetzer #17 6-3 7-5 Debbie Graham #71 Match data
Mar 15, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amanda Coetzer #38 6-2 6-4 Debbie Graham #39 Match data
Feb 27, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amanda Coetzer #60 4-6 6-0 6-0 Debbie Graham #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Debbie Graham #729 #35 190 1,756 83 90 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Debbie Graham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% 1,502 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #138 1,548 0 0
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1989 2–4 33.3% #256 1,512 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0 1990 5–4 55.6% #121 1,582 0 0
20 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0 1991 14–11 56.0% #42 1,685 0 0
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2 1992 21–19 52.5% #51 1,727 0 0
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3 1993 21–22 48.8% #65 1,682 0 0
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3 1994 8–10 44.4% #68 1,697 0 0
24 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3 1995 4–12 25.0% #131 1,598 0 0
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5 1996 4–5 44.4% #122 1,607 0 0
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9