H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 1-2
Gigi Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gigi Fernandez leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1994 Filderstadt fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1994* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 7-5 6-4 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1991* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-4 6-2 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 6-3 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Coetzer | Gigi Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |