H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 1-1
Amanda Coetzer and Halle Cioffi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1992 San Juan fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1992* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1991* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Halle Cioffi | 6-1 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Coetzer | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |