H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Jana Novotna H2H: 3-2

Amanda Coetzer holds a 3–2 lead over Jana Novotna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 2–0 on carpet, while Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1997 Leipzig final 6-2 4-6 6-3.

RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
CZE Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 28, 1997* Leipzig WTA 250 F Carpet Jana Novotna #2 6-2 4-6 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #6 Match data
Aug 23, 1997* Atlanta WTA 250 QF Hard Amanda Coetzer #5 1-6 6-3 6-1 Jana Novotna #3 Match data
Apr 11, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #14 6-2 1-6 6-1 Jana Novotna #4 Match data
Nov 18, 1996 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Jana Novotna #3 6-4 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data
Aug 19, 1995* Canadian Open WTA 1000 SF Hard Amanda Coetzer #27 6-4 6-3 Jana Novotna #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Jana Novotna #18 #2 5,063 2,224 504 198 71.8% 1 4 1 5 13 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Jana Novotna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0 1986 0–4 0.0% #171 1,466 0 0
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1987 21–17 55.3% #47 1,752 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0 1988 23–18 56.1% #35 1,757 0 1
20 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0 1989 45–17 72.6% #11 1,962 0 2
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2 1990 40–16 71.4% #13 2,016 0 3
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3 1991 45–15 75.0% #7 2,072 0 5
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3 1992 36–17 67.9% #10 2,089 0 5
24 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3 1993 46–15 75.4% #6 2,103 0 7
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5 1994 43–11 79.6% #4 2,141 0 10
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1995 30–12 71.4% #11 2,031 0 11
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6 1996 47–12 79.7% #5 2,209 0 15
28 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7 1997 52–15 77.6% #2 2,173 0 19
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1998 50–14 78.1% #3 2,129 1 23
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8 1999 26–15 63.4% #18 1,924 1 24
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9