H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 3-2

Amanda Coetzer holds a 3–2 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1998 Australian Open second round 2-6 6-1 6-0.

RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amanda Coetzer #4 2-6 6-1 6-0 Larisa Savchenko #87 Match data
Aug 27, 1994* Schenectady WTA 250 SF Hard Larisa Savchenko #43 6-3 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #13 Match data
Jun 29, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Larisa Savchenko #58 1-6 6-3 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #14 Match data
Apr 7, 1994* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #15 6-2 6-2 Larisa Savchenko #54 Match data
May 26, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Amanda Coetzer #13 6-0 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Amanda Coetzer Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2