H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1995 Tokyo third round 7-5 5-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 7-5 5-7 7-6 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amanda Coetzer | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |