H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 0-4

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1993 Manhattan Beach quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 1993* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Martina Navratilova #4 6-1 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data
Jun 19, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Martina Navratilova #4 6-0 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #89 Match data
Apr 4, 1991* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #96 Match data
Feb 28, 1991* Palm Springs WTA 250 R32 Hard Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168