H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 0-4

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1993 Manhattan Beach quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova #4 6-1 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data Aug 14, 1993* QF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Navratilova #4 6-0 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #89 Match data Jun 19, 1991* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #96 Match data Apr 4, 1991* R32 Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay
Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #73 Match data Feb 25, 1991 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer — #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Martina Navratilova — #1 290 2,683 1,419 230 86.1% 18 3 8 51 87 167

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,247 0 5
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,171 0 7
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,254 0 13
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1978 78–10 88.6% #1 2,411 1 24
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,438 2 34
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1980 86–13 86.9% #3 2,360 2 45
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,426 3 55
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,541 5 70
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,641 8 86
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,651 11 99
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,597 13 111
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,635 15 125
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,528 17 129
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,456 17 138
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,323 18 152
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,322 18 157
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% — 1,910 18 167

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Martina Navratilova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1980 18 6 24 75.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0%
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0%
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7%
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4%
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8%
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7%
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8%
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 344 58 402 85.6% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Martina Navratilova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.94
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 +0.02 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -10.07
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1975 2248 173.0 — — — — +7 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.5 -12.63
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -7 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1976 2171 161.3 — — — — +2 -37 -76 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.18
20 1992 1866 153.9 — — — — -32 +15 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1977 2254 173.5 — — — — +99 -71 -111 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.88
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +11 -31 -405 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1978 2411 178.8 — — — — +64 -284 -71 83.2% +2.69 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -7.28
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +96 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1979 2439 178.9 — — — — +41 -219 -58 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.91
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +75 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1980 2360 177.9 — — — — +171 -59 -3 81.3% +2.45 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 102.1 -5.38
24 1996 1856 161.8 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1981 2426 179.3 — — — — +101 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 94.1 -8.88
25 1997 2015 167.3 — — — — -44 +102 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1982 2542 179.1 — — — — +105 -126 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -3.08
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -218 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.84 1983 2641 183.1 — — — — +115 -238 -77 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.54
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 1984 2652 177.3 — — — — +102 -154 -67 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 1985 2597 177.7 — — — — +45 -40 +98 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -2.02
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 1986 2635 182.2 — — — — +71 -120 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.42
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 1987 2529 176.8 — — — — +116 -44 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.19
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 1988 2457 176.8 — — — — +130 +14 +224 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.28
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 1989 2426 176.3 — — — — +96 -17 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -1.86
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +100 +63 +416 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +107 +4 +335 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2329 175.0 — — — — +96 — +413 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2266 172.8 — — — — +96 -13 +353 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.1 -1.33
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +132 +37 +403 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11
48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08
Career — 2053 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -162 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.52 — 2683 180.1 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +80 -38 +50 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.5 -5.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.