H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 0-3

Meredith Mcgrath holds a 3–0 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meredith Mcgrath leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1996 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meredith Mcgrath #27 7-6 2-6 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data Jun 28, 1996* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Meredith Mcgrath #66 7-6 2-6 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #18 Match data Feb 18, 1994* R16 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Meredith Mcgrath #103 6-2 7-6 Amanda Coetzer #64 Match data Feb 26, 1990 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21 1988 1497 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1989 1517 113.0 — — — — +50 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.67
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1990 1709 138.3 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1991 1679 124.7 — — — — +46 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -20 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1994 1768 146.2 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1995 1742 142.5 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 1928 144.8 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.