H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 2-3

Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 3–2 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Naoko Sawamatsu #33 3-6 6-3 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #8 Match data
May 22, 1997* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #11 6-1 6-2 Naoko Sawamatsu #41 Match data
Jan 13, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #28 4-6 6-3 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data
Jan 17, 1993* Melbourne WTA 250 F Hard Amanda Coetzer #19 6-2 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #24 Match data
Mar 17, 1991* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #27 4-6 6-2 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9