H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-0
Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics second round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-4 7-6(5) | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,052 | 497 | 310 | 61.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 197 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Coetzer | Rachel Mcquillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #17 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #38 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #186 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #12 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,794 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |