H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 5-1

Amanda Coetzer holds a 5–1 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2000 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
ROU Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #18 6-0 6-4 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data May 3, 2000* R32 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Amanda Coetzer #13 6-3 6-1 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Oct 16, 1998* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie 6-2 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #4 Match data May 7, 1998* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amanda Coetzer #4 6-4 6-7 6-0 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Apr 10, 1998* R16 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Amanda Coetzer #21 6-2 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Mar 19, 1995* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #18 6-4 4-6 6-4 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Jan 20, 1995* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,960 186 182 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 0
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,663 0 0
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1996 31–16 66.0% — 1,845 0 3
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,831 0 4
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 2000 20–25 44.4% — 1,671 0 4
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,542 0 4
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,510 0 4
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,504 0 4
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1996 7 6 13 53.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1999 12 10 22 54.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 7 12 19 36.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 62 75 137 45.3% 95 64 159 59.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 10 27 37 27.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 7/51 of Amanda Coetzer's and 1/4 of Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Coetzer Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
31 2003 5/46 0.6 2.6 67.1% 60.3% 44.8% 58.0% 41.1% 55.6% 43.5% 2004 1/4 2.0 5.0 60.0% 55.6% 29.2% 54.5% 33.3% 45.0% 37.0%
32 2004 2/5 0.0 1.0 71.5% 51.7% 48.7% 53.3% 75.0% 50.9% 54.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7/807 0.4 2.1 68.3% 57.8% 45.9% 56.7% 50.8% 54.2% 46.6% — 1/368 2.0 5.0 60.0% 55.6% 29.2% 54.5% 33.3% 45.0% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1993 1584 120.7 — — — — -73 +68 +30 45.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +0.86
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1994 1590 113.2 — — — — -94 +83 — 44.1% -0.53 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.7 +0.90
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1995 1663 135.9 — — — — -137 +102 — 51.9% +0.39 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 +0.99
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1996 1846 133.4 — — — — -211 +41 -120 59.3% +0.43 16–5 (76%) 9–2 (82%) 115.9 +0.11
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1997 1778 145.5 — — — — -116 +159 +33 55.0% +0.30 15–10 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 +0.55
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1998 1696 144.6 — — — — -43 +199 — 46.9% -0.16 4–10 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 96.4 -0.86
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82 1999 1832 151.2 — — — — -61 +71 -133 55.6% +0.52 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.42
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 2000 1672 134.5 — — — — -57 +196 +97 48.1% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 97.6 -1.14
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 2001 1543 113.9 — — — — +72 +132 +197 37.3% -0.58 3–6 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 91.5 +0.37
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 2003 1511 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 2004 1505 112.3 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% +91 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.20
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 1960 141.7 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% -80 +118 +9 50.4% +0.05 64–61 (51%) 38–33 (54%) 105.1 +0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.