H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 3-0

Amanda Coetzer holds a 3–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2000 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cacic
USA Age 51 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #14 6-2 6-2 Sandra Cacic #144 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amanda Coetzer #15 6-2 6-0 Sandra Cacic #76 Match data Nov 12, 1998* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amanda Coetzer #11 6-1 7-6 Sandra Cacic #72 Match data Sep 2, 1998* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Sandra Cacic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Sandra Cacic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Sandra Cacic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) — -1.00 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.77 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.15
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.99 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — +1.59 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.72 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.41
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) — -2.38 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.12
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.79 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.54 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.82 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.50 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.42 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) — +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.