H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 5-0

Amanda Coetzer holds a 5–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1996 Manhattan Beach round of 16 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Shi-Ting Wang
TPE Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #16 6-2 6-1 Shi-Ting Wang #42 Match data Aug 16, 1996* R16 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #23 1-6 6-4 6-2 Shi-Ting Wang #67 Match data Sep 22, 1995* R16 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #21 6-2 7-5 Shi-Ting Wang #52 Match data Mar 20, 1995* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #13 6-7 6-3 6-3 Shi-Ting Wang #35 Match data Aug 27, 1994* QF Schenectady Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #16 6-1 6-3 Shi-Ting Wang #45 Match data Sep 2, 1993* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Shi-Ting Wang #457 #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Shi-Ting Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,804 0 6
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,681 0 6
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Shi-Ting Wang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Shi-Ting Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.10
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.89
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1997 1682 134.5 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -61 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.22
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -66 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.