H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Steffi Graf H2H: 4-11

Steffi Graf holds an 11–4 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 5–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1998 New Haven quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
4 – 11
15 main-draw meetings
Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steffi Graf #38 6-3 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #12 Match data Aug 29, 1998* QF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #11 6-1 6-4 Steffi Graf #2 Match data Jun 5, 1997* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Steffi Graf #2 4-6 7-5 7-6 Amanda Coetzer #11 Match data May 24, 1997* SF Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Amanda Coetzer #10 6-0 6-1 Steffi Graf #2 Match data May 17, 1997* QF Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amanda Coetzer #14 6-2 7-5 Steffi Graf #1 Match data Jan 22, 1997* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data Mar 17, 1996* QF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-2 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data Nov 13, 1995 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 6-7 6-1 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #22 Match data Aug 30, 1995* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amanda Coetzer #27 3-6 6-2 7-6 Steffi Graf #1 Match data Aug 17, 1995* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-3 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #22 Match data Jun 30, 1995* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Steffi Graf #1 6-0 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #13 Match data Sep 8, 1994* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-0 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #16 Match data Feb 21, 1994 F Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #15 Match data Nov 15, 1993 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data Nov 13, 1993* QF Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 6-2 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #25 Match data May 31, 1992* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 0 1 0 1 7 9
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,603 876 110 88.8% 22 1 15 5 32 32 107

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Steffi Graf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,545 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,748 0 0
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,038 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,322 0 8
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1988 73–3 96.1% #1 2,539 5 30
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,588 8 44
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,512 9 54
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,420 10 61
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1992 66–7 90.4% #2 2,434 11 69
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,506 14 79
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,414 15 86
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,464 18 95
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,475 21 102
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,400 21 103
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,305 21 106
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 107
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Steffi Graf
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1985 19 6 25 76.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1986 20 3 23 87.0% 24 1 25 96.0% — — — — 19 2 21 90.5%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 23 1 24 95.8% 32 0 32 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 9 0 9 100.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1988 39 1 40 97.5% 20 1 21 95.2% 7 0 7 100.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 39 0 39 100.0% 25 2 27 92.6% 7 0 7 100.0% 14 0 14 100.0%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 23 1 24 95.8% 20 2 22 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 22 4 26 84.6% 19 2 21 90.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1992 13 2 15 86.7% 25 3 28 89.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 21 2 23 91.3%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1993 33 2 35 94.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9%
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 38 2 40 95.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 22 1 23 95.7% 11 0 11 100.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 8 1 9 88.9%
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 21 1 22 95.5% 14 1 15 93.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1997 3 1 4 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 15 5 20 75.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 350 39 389 90.0% 267 32 299 89.3% 84 14 98 85.7% 175 25 200 87.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Steffi Graf
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 99.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.64
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1507 121.5 — — — — — +26 — 38.5% -0.62 0–1 — — +0.12
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1546 109.1 — — — — +59 +52 +29 48.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.35
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1748 139.6 — — — — -68 -81 -28 51.4% +0.26 9–3 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 111.2 -0.41
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1985 2038 163.0 — — — — -73 -131 -289 69.6% +1.45 9–4 (69%) 10–3 (77%) 110.8 -2.74
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21 1986 2322 176.8 — — — — -62 -128 — 80.5% +2.45 17–3 (85%) 6–7 (46%) 110.7 -5.94
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1987 2505 181.5 — — — — -48 -84 -637 90.8% +3.42 9–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) 107.5 -4.82
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1988 2540 181.5 — — — — -7 -92 -528 91.8% +3.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -1.98
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1989 2588 183.5 — — — — +30 -140 -492 93.4% +3.80 7–2 (78%) 2–2 (50%) 102.4 -1.81
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1990 2512 178.9 — — — — +89 -52 -324 89.0% +3.13 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.44
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1991 2420 177.1 — — — — +72 +83 -183 86.8% +3.10 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 92.3 -0.99
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1992 2435 179.0 — — — — +24 +66 -41 82.0% +2.69 16–5 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 -1.85
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1993 2506 183.0 — — — — -28 +45 -107 86.5% +2.91 13–3 (81%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -3.07
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1994 2415 179.9 — — — — +25 +40 — 86.0% +3.10 7–3 (70%) 3–7 (30%) 93.7 -1.05
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82 1995 2465 178.3 — — — — +6 +52 -61 87.4% +2.78 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.58
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 1996 2475 176.2 — — — — -6 +55 +63 89.5% +2.71 6–1 (86%) 8–2 (80%) 104.0 -1.13
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 1997 2400 149.1 — — — — +38 +70 — 75.0% +1.65 4–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — 0.00
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 1998 2305 172.9 — — — — +58 — +169 74.5% +2.06 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 98.2 -1.13
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 1999 2243 171.2 — — — — -5 +219 +171 70.7% +1.82 13–4 (76%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 -2.55
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 2604 181.8 — — — — +8 -20 -151 83.0% +2.71 147–45 (77%) 78–58 (57%) 106.9 -3.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.