H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 1-0

Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1990 Boca Raton round of 32 6-1 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #68 6-1 2-6 6-2 Sylvia Hanika #36 Match data Mar 8, 1990* R32 Boca Raton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer — #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Sylvia Hanika — #5 48 2,137 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Sylvia Hanika
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,950 0 3
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1980 40–22 64.5% — 2,003 0 4
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,085 0 6
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,946 0 7
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,970 0 7
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,880 0 8
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1985 22–16 57.9% — 1,868 0 8
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,919 0 9
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Sylvia Hanika
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1977 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Sylvia Hanika
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1976 1533 101.8 — — — — +88 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.64
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 +0.02 1977 1584 118.4 — — — — +75 -25 — 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 — +1.84
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1978 1817 145.6 — — — — -62 -183 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.65
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -7 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1979 1951 158.3 — — — — -90 -104 -188 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.6 -2.46
20 1992 1866 153.9 — — — — -32 +15 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1980 2003 159.4 — — — — +15 -68 -218 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -6.31
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +11 -31 -405 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1981 2085 166.5 — — — — -7 +24 — 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.73
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +96 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1982 1946 157.2 — — — — +137 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.3 -1.96
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +75 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1983 1971 163.0 — — — — +82 +36 -191 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.30
24 1996 1856 161.8 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1984 1880 145.2 — — — — +103 +50 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.38
25 1997 2015 167.3 — — — — -44 +102 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1985 1868 147.5 — — — — +28 +92 — 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.6 -2.52
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -218 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.84 1986 1804 136.3 — — — — +9 +158 -98 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.59
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 1987 1920 155.2 — — — — +18 +3 -153 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.5 -1.48
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 1988 1919 153.4 — — — — +53 +15 -188 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.02
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 1989 1806 132.5 — — — — +29 +122 — 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.41
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 1990 1703 116.6 — — — — +42 +152 — 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) — — +0.81
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -162 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.52 — 2138 160.0 — — — — +39 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.0 -3.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.