H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Tracy Austin H2H: 1-0

Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Tracy Austin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1994 Charleston Open round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #16 6-4 7-5 Tracy Austin #101 Match data Mar 31, 1994* R32 Charleston Open WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer — #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 +0.02 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -7 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41
20 1992 1866 153.9 — — — — -32 +15 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +11 -31 -405 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +96 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +75 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 1856 161.8 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 2015 167.3 — — — — -44 +102 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -218 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.84 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -162 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.52 — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.