H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-2
Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1993 Australian Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-2 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Coetzer | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |