H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amanda Hopmans vs Amelie Cocheteux H2H: 0-1

Amelie Cocheteux holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amelie Cocheteux leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amelie Cocheteux won the 1999 Warsaw round of 32 7-6 3-6 6-0.

NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amelie Cocheteux #57 7-6 3-6 6-0 Amanda Hopmans #83 Match data May 6, 1999* R32 Warsaw Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Hopmans Amelie Cocheteux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0
19 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0
20 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0
21 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0
22 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0
23 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0
24 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0
25 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Hopmans Amelie Cocheteux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1490 99.1 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.07
18 1996 1468 94.6 0.0% -3.25 +0.18
19 1997 1492 108.2 +57 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 +0.11
20 1998 1530 115.1 +15 +34 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42
21 1999 1565 110.5 +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17
22 2000 1463 103.9 +81 -6 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44
23 1999 1549 120.0 +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43
24 2000 1539 112.0 +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81
25 2001 1518 107.4 +27 -16 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 -0.79
Career 1604 115.7 +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00 1583 110.6 +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.