H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amanda Hopmans vs Gloria Pizzichini H2H: 0-1

Gloria Pizzichini holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gloria Pizzichini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gloria Pizzichini won the 2000 US Open first round 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Hopmans
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gloria Pizzichini
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gloria Pizzichini #119 7-6 6-0 Amanda Hopmans #81 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gloria Pizzichini #1,139 #45 500 1,670 28 45 38.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Hopmans Gloria Pizzichini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 2–3 40.0% #89 1,525 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1993 4–11 26.7% #200 1,510 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 11–8 57.9% #52 1,600 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1997 7–13 35.0% #90 1,618 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #732 1,596 0 1
23 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #212 1,574 0 1
24 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0 2000 3–2 60.0% #135 1,595 0 1
25 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0 2001 0–3 0.0% #222 1,554 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #259 1,535 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Hopmans Gloria Pizzichini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 5 10 15 33.3% 9 17 26 34.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — 3 18 21 14.3% 19 19 38 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Hopmans Gloria Pizzichini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1525 108.0 — — — — — +38 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 0–1 — -0.50
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 120.0 — — — — +17 +5 +119 26.7% -1.87 — 2–3 (40%) — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1495 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.22
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1601 127.9 — — — — -115 +95 +62 55.8% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 105.0 +0.56
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1618 126.0 — — — — -136 +96 — 36.2% -1.09 4–5 (44%) 6–0 (100%) 103.1 -0.64
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1596 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.26
23 1999 1549 120.0 — — — — +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43 1999 1575 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25
24 2000 1539 112.0 — — — — +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81 2000 1595 116.0 — — — — — +116 — 58.3% +0.83 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
25 2001 1518 107.4 — — — — +27 -16 — 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 — -0.79 2001 1554 93.7 — — — — — — — 14.3% -3.43 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1535 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — +0.34
Career — 1604 115.7 — — — — +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00 — 1671 124.9 — — — — -67 +78 +83 39.6% -0.82 9–11 (45%) 12–6 (67%) 105.5 +0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.