H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amanda Tobin vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Tobin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1986 US Open second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 66
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-3 | Amanda Tobin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Tobin | #351 | #138 | 4 | 1,624 | 45 | 77 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amanda Tobin | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #210 | 1,470 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |