H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Amanda Tobin vs Jane Stratton H2H: 1-2
Jane Stratton holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Tobin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jane Stratton leads 2–0 on grass, while Amanda Tobin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jane Stratton won the 1978 New South Wales third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 66
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 72
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1978* | New South Wales | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Jane Stratton | 6-2 6-2 | Amanda Tobin | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1978* | Christchurch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Jane Stratton | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | Amanda Tobin | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1978* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Amanda Tobin | 6-1 6-2 | Jane Stratton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Tobin | #351 | #138 | 4 | 1,624 | 45 | 77 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jane Stratton | — | — | — | 1,691 | 49 | 52 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Tobin | Jane Stratton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #210 | 1,470 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |