H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Tobin vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Tobin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1986 Oklahoma round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Tobin
AUS Age 66 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #132 6-3 6-2 Amanda Tobin Match data Feb 27, 1986* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Tobin #351 #138 4 1,632 45 77 36.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Tobin Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,537 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1977 3–5 37.5% — 1,535 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1978 8–10 44.4% — 1,558 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1979 2–6 25.0% — 1,503 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1980 6–9 40.0% — 1,564 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1981 7–6 53.8% — 1,612 0 2 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1982 5–7 41.7% — 1,604 0 3 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,604 0 3 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1984 0–4 0.0% — 1,521 0 3 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1985 3–5 37.5% — 1,560 0 3 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1986 5–13 27.8% #138 1,505 0 3 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1987 2–5 28.6% #210 1,472 0 3 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1988 0–1 0.0% #351 1,457 0 3 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Tobin Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1976 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1977 — — — — — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1978 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1987 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 16 25 36.0% 3 10 13 23.1% 25 47 72 34.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Tobin Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1976 1537 111.2 — — — — — — +75 50.0% +1.00 2–0 0–1 — +0.21 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1977 1536 103.1 — — — — — — +15 37.5% -0.63 — 0–1 — +0.67 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1978 1559 119.3 — — — — +90 -3 -15 45.7% -0.29 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +1.52 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1979 1503 92.9 — — — — — — +19 31.6% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +1.72 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1980 1564 108.2 — — — — — — -6 45.2% -0.29 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 101.0 +0.09 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1981 1613 117.9 — — — — — — -50 61.5% +0.73 0–2 1–0 — +0.39 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1982 1604 110.0 — — — — — -112 -1 41.7% -0.67 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.66 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1983 1605 115.8 — — — — — — -9 41.2% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.63 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1984 1521 88.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +1.02 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1985 1561 124.2 — — — — -49 — +40 45.0% +0.05 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.17 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1986 1505 106.5 — — — — +11 — +56 27.0% -2.03 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.6 +1.27 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1987 1473 97.7 — — — — +35 — +9 44.4% -0.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.93 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1988 1457 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.22 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1632 114.9 — — — — +18 -50 +4 40.6% -0.60 7–20 (26%) 15–9 (63%) 98.0 +6.64 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.