H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amelie Cocheteux vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-1

Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Amelie Cocheteux in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1997 Maria Lankowitz round of 16 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amelie Cocheteux
FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #24 6-3 6-0 Amelie Cocheteux #141 Match data Aug 1, 1997* R16 Maria Lankowitz Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0
22 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Judith Wiesner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0% — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Judith Wiesner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1490 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1468 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1492 108.2 — — — — — +57 — 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.11 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09
20 1998 1530 115.1 — — — — +15 +34 — 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77
21 1999 1565 110.5 — — — — +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26
22 2000 1463 103.9 — — — — +81 -6 — 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60
Career — 1583 110.6 — — — — +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91 — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.