H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amelie Cocheteux vs Meike Babel H2H: 1-0

Amelie Cocheteux holds a 1–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amelie Cocheteux leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amelie Cocheteux won the 1998 Maria Lankowitz quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amelie Cocheteux #90 6-1 6-4 Meike Babel #78 Match data Jul 11, 1998* QF Maria Lankowitz Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meike Babel #446 #27 377 1,784 71 86 45.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Meike Babel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #134 1,486 0 0
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0 1992 10–18 35.7% #86 1,523 0 0
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0 1993 17–15 53.1% #49 1,616 0 0
19 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0 1994 13–12 52.0% #46 1,660 0 0
20 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0 1995 14–10 58.3% #32 1,751 0 0
21 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0
22 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0 1997 7–8 46.7% #116 1,702 0 0
23 1998 9–16 36.0% #100 1,643 0 0
25 2000 1–5 16.7% #425 1,571 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Meike Babel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 4 10 14 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
Career 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 20 31 51 39.2% 40 42 82 48.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Meike Babel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1486 116.6 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.11
17 1995 1490 99.1 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.07 1992 1524 111.1 0 +43 36.1% -1.25 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 106.5 +0.29
18 1996 1468 94.6 0.0% -3.25 +0.18 1993 1617 122.8 -68 +61 46.9% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.80
19 1997 1492 108.2 +57 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 +0.11 1994 1660 133.6 -29 -5 55.6% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 95.6 +1.21
20 1998 1530 115.1 +15 +34 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42 1995 1752 137.0 -21 -74 59.3% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.5 -2.02
21 1999 1565 110.5 +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17
22 2000 1463 103.9 +81 -6 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44 1997 1703 118.3 -34 +27 40.0% -0.43 2–0 0–5 (0%) +0.22
23 1998 1643 129.8 +3 +57 42.9% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -1.62
25 2000 1572 85.7 +26 15.4% -2.62 1–0 0–1 +0.31
Career 1583 110.6 +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91 1784 130.2 -23 +23 45.5% -0.38 18–18 (50%) 8–17 (32%) 98.2 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.