H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amelie Cocheteux vs Paola Suarez H2H: 1-0

Amelie Cocheteux holds a 1–0 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amelie Cocheteux leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amelie Cocheteux won the 2000 Miami Open round of 128 3-6 6-4 7-5.

FRA Age 48 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amelie Cocheteux #77 3-6 6-4 7-5 Paola Suarez #57 Match data Mar 21, 2000* R128 Miami Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amelie Cocheteux #365 #55 552 1,583 28 53 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paola Suarez #525 #9 2,081 1,913 224 182 55.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Paola Suarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #228 1,489 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #197 1,519 0 0
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #166 1,468 0 0 1994 5–8 38.5% #114 1,536 0 0
19 1997 2–3 40.0% #104 1,492 0 0 1995 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
20 1998 7–11 38.9% #81 1,529 0 0 1996 12–11 52.2% #62 1,618 0 0
21 1999 15–19 44.1% #64 1,565 0 0 1997 6–16 27.3% #118 1,554 0 0
22 2000 4–17 19.0% #180 1,463 0 0 1998 10–9 52.6% #80 1,533 0 1
23 1999 12–12 50.0% #72 1,596 0 1
24 2000 27–23 54.0% #36 1,675 0 1
25 2001 27–15 64.3% #27 1,736 0 2
26 2002 30–23 56.6% #27 1,693 0 2
27 2003 37–22 62.7% #14 1,858 0 3
28 2004 38–18 67.9% #16 1,797 0 4
29 2005 3–7 30.0% #238 1,730 0 4
30 2006 10–9 52.6% #178 1,707 0 4
31 2007 3–2 60.0% #300 1,695 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Paola Suarez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 3 10 13 23.1% 20 10 30 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2001 8 7 15 53.3% 19 7 26 73.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2003 18 11 29 62.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 20 11 31 64.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2005 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2007 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 11 17 28 39.3% 12 23 35 34.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 72 80 152 47.4% 137 82 219 62.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amelie Cocheteux Paola Suarez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1490 99.1 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.07 1993 1519 104.4 +58 66.7% +1.17 +0.38
18 1996 1468 94.6 0.0% -3.25 +0.18 1994 1536 111.5 -23 +102 41.4% -0.86 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.29
19 1997 1492 108.2 +57 36.4% -1.00 1–0 0–1 +0.11 1995 1522 118.6 -37 +115 28.6% -0.86 0–1 -0.13
20 1998 1530 115.1 +15 +34 41.0% -0.72 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 +0.42 1996 1618 124.9 -93 +76 50.0% -0.08 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +1.09
21 1999 1565 110.5 +39 -57 -53 42.0% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 107.5 +1.17 1997 1555 120.2 -22 +67 33.3% -1.35 2–4 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +0.40
22 2000 1463 103.9 +81 -6 28.3% -1.89 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.44 1998 1534 107.3 -20 +87 50.0% +0.29 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.3 +3.05
23 1999 1596 122.0 -100 +73 47.4% -0.07 6–3 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 +0.07
24 2000 1676 138.4 -179 +128 -157 54.0% +0.41 8–11 (42%) 5–7 (42%) 99.5 -0.08
25 2001 1736 140.5 -153 +171 58.1% +0.80 8–0 (100%) 4–6 (40%) 105.8 +1.00
26 2002 1693 139.5 -132 +227 57.4% +0.57 8–12 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 98.3 -0.89
27 2003 1859 149.0 +1.97 +3.59 1.211 54.4% -98 +75 -262 60.0% +0.72 12–11 (52%) 5–2 (71%) 105.6 +0.59
28 2004 1797 134.6 +1.65 +4.08 1.230 54.7% -92 +170 -111 63.6% +0.92 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.55
29 2005 1731 112.0 -0.77 +0.57 0.918 46.7% -109 +222 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.17
30 2006 1707 121.7 -2.09 -0.88 0.897 47.5% -61 +168 +8 58.8% +0.18 2–2 (50%) 2–0 -0.50
31 2007 1696 110.9 -0.19 -2.20 1.107 52.1% -44 58.3% +1.08 1–1 0–1 +0.05
Career 1583 110.6 +49 -5 -53 36.6% -1.18 9–11 (45%) 8–7 (53%) 100.7 +1.91 1914 139.3 +0.87 +2.37 1.135 52.9% -101 +132 -137 54.3% +0.35 62–57 (52%) 37–37 (50%) 101.9 +1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.