H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Alexandra Stevenson H2H: 1-3

Alexandra Stevenson holds a 3–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Alexandra Stevenson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2002 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Alexandra Stevenson
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #76 7-6(6) 6-2 Alexandra Stevenson #29 Match data Jun 20, 2002* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Alexandra Stevenson #34 1-6 6-4 6-4 Amy Frazier #50 Match data Feb 28, 2002* R32 Scottsdale Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Alexandra Stevenson #111 6-1 5-7 6-4 Amy Frazier #22 Match data Aug 2, 2001* R32 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Alexandra Stevenson #86 6-1 3-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #28 Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Alexandra Stevenson #805 #18 1,444 1,844 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Alexandra Stevenson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #371 1,496 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 1997 0–2 0.0% #394 1,475 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 1998 3–7 30.0% #132 1,477 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1999 13–11 54.2% #45 1,673 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 2000 9–24 27.3% #92 1,520 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 2001 15–15 50.0% #60 1,672 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 2002 31–24 56.4% #18 1,835 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 2003 13–26 33.3% #81 1,609 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 2004 0–7 0.0% #287 1,514 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 2005 0–1 0.0% #643 1,507 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2006 0–4 0.0% #398 1,463 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2008 1–1 50.0% #211 1,475 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2009 0–2 0.0% #218 1,447 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2011 1–3 25.0% #269 1,441 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Alexandra Stevenson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 4 11 15 26.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 23 16 39 59.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 48 75 123 39.0% 7 21 28 25.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 16 18 34 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 16/58 of Alexandra Stevenson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/39 10.0 5.7 63.6% 66.8% 40.3% 71.7% 36.1% 56.9% 31.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/7 2.5 6.5 57.2% 64.5% 40.5% 31.3% 6.3% 53.7% 32.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 2.5 3.0 56.8% 56.9% 40.8% 55.2% 40.0% 50.1% 28.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 2.0 2.0 65.3% 65.1% 32.1% 50.0% 54.2% 54.4% 42.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 3.5 6.0 56.0% 64.4% 41.2% 64.2% 28.3% 53.0% 35.5%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% 2011 3/4 3.3 5.0 48.3% 53.5% 43.3% 51.5% 51.4% 48.2% 46.6%
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 16/214 4.1 4.6 57.5% 61.0% 40.1% 55.1% 37.5% 52.4% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 1996 1497 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.12
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 1997 1475 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.30
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 1998 1478 103.0 — — — — +11 — — 36.4% -1.05 0–2 0–1 — +0.97
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1999 1674 132.4 — — — — -104 — +100 49.1% -0.36 8–1 (89%) 5–1 (83%) 112.3 -1.46
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 2000 1521 121.1 — — — — +12 -47 +192 32.9% -1.27 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.1 +0.34
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 2001 1673 133.8 — — — — -28 -210 +89 53.1% +0.08 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -1.23
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 2002 1836 146.6 — — — — +21 -391 -146 53.7% +0.15 14–10 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 109.1 +0.07
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 2003 1610 118.0 +0.40 -2.78 0.731 44.9% +56 -204 +23 38.1% -0.79 4–8 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 94.0 +2.32
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 2004 1514 94.8 -0.12 -2.43 0.700 42.9% +34 — — 17.6% -2.30 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.16
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 2005 1507 101.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.06
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 2006 1464 99.6 -2.52 -4.98 0.569 40.6% +19 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.13
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2008 1476 106.2 +1.20 +0.54 0.922 47.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2009 1448 97.2 -2.56 -1.28 0.756 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.14
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2011 1441 97.3 -2.94 -0.45 0.899 47.3% — — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.07
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1430 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1416 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1845 131.9 -1.29 -2.25 0.745 44.3% +9 -164 +56 42.6% -0.60 33–35 (49%) 34–26 (57%) 106.1 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.