H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 1-0

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1989 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amy Frazier #56 6-3 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,739 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,538 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,494 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,602 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,646 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,732 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,709 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,577 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,621 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,593 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,572 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —