H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 3-3

Amy Frazier and Amanda Coetzer are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1999 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #22 6-0 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #9 Match data
Aug 7, 1999* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Amanda Coetzer #9 7-5 6-1 Amy Frazier #26 Match data
Sep 25, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #63 0-6 6-3 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data
Aug 8, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #37 6-1 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #5 Match data
May 29, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amanda Coetzer #11 7-6(5) 6-4 Amy Frazier #30 Match data
Mar 22, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R64 Hard Amanda Coetzer #133 6-3 6-4 Amy Frazier #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —