H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Anke Huber H2H: 6-2

Amy Frazier holds a 6–2 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 6–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2000 Montreal fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #20 6-4 3-6 6-4 Anke Huber #10 Match data
Aug 3, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-0 7-6(3) Anke Huber #9 Match data
Mar 23, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #21 5-7 6-4 6-3 Anke Huber #16 Match data
Mar 2, 2000* Scottsdale WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #19 7-6(1) 6-2 Anke Huber #17 Match data
Jul 29, 1999* Stanford WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #28 6-2 6-4 Anke Huber #30 Match data
Jan 15, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Anke Huber #7 0-6 6-2 7-5 Amy Frazier #31 Match data
Aug 12, 1994* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-0 7-5 Anke Huber #14 Match data
Jan 16, 1993* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Anke Huber #13 6-4 6-3 Amy Frazier #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —