H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Ann Grossman H2H: 3-1

Amy Frazier holds a 3–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1996 Canadian Open third round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 1996* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #23 6-2 6-0 Ann Grossman #66 Match data
Feb 24, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #19 2-6 6-2 6-3 Ann Grossman #74 Match data
Aug 14, 1994* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 F Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-1 6-3 Ann Grossman #46 Match data
Feb 29, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Ann Grossman #68 6-4 5-7 6-4 Amy Frazier #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —