H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 4-3

Amy Frazier holds a 4–3 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2001 Roland Garros second round 1-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amy Frazier #24 1-6 6-3 6-4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #8 Match data
Aug 11, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #20 6-3 3-6 6-3 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #10 Match data
Aug 9, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #37 3-6 6-1 6-3 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #8 Match data
Jan 10, 1997* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #33 6-3 6-3 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #3 Match data
Sep 26, 1994* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 F Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-1 6-2 Amy Frazier #14 Match data
Sep 26, 1993* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 QF Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #74 Match data
Jan 23, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #6 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,385 708 267 72.6% 4 7 0 1 17 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1988 31–15 67.4% #18 1,809 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,068 1 3
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,081 1 5
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,166 1 6
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1992 59–15 79.7% #4 2,288 1 8
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,156 3 22
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1996 52–16 76.5% #3 2,106 3 24
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,022 3 24
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,039 4 26
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,932 4 27
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2000 38–18 67.9% #8 1,930 4 27
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,795 4 29
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —