H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 0-1

Asa Carlsson holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Asa Carlsson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Asa Carlsson #53 6-3 4-6 7-5 Amy Frazier #23 Match data May 31, 2000* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Asa Carlsson #1,024 #28 831 1,817 128 171 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Asa Carlsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #202 1,484 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1993 4–7 36.4% #164 1,500 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1994 15–16 48.4% #70 1,640 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1995 22–19 53.7% #49 1,748 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1996 15–19 44.1% #39 1,738 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1997 18–22 45.0% #45 1,666 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1998 8–13 38.1% #92 1,603 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1999 14–12 53.8% #61 1,658 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2000 12–16 42.9% #57 1,632 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 2001 6–21 22.2% #102 1,514 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2002 12–13 48.0% #78 1,570 0 2
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2003 1–7 12.5% #345 1,495 0 2
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2004 1–5 16.7% #207 1,465 0 2
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Asa Carlsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 4 5 9 44.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 7 8 15 46.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 9 3 12 75.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 1 9 10 10.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 2 6 8 25.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 50 73 123 40.7% 59 61 120 49.2% 4 11 15 26.7% 15 26 41 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Asa Carlsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 1992 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.16
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1993 1501 102.4 — — — — +21 +53 — 33.3% -1.33 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1994 1640 133.8 — — — — -64 +27 — 49.3% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 -0.18
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1995 1748 136.0 — — — — -64 -7 — 53.1% -0.17 7–7 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 104.2 -0.88
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1996 1738 141.8 — — — — +2 -54 — 45.7% -0.35 6–9 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -1.29
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1997 1666 133.5 — — — — +33 -20 -109 42.0% -0.69 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.9 -1.60
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1998 1603 112.8 — — — — +15 +34 — 41.3% -0.76 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1999 1659 119.8 — — — — +23 -52 — 50.8% +0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 +1.33
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 2000 1632 121.3 — — — — -10 +42 — 40.6% -0.83 6–2 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 108.5 -1.52
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 2001 1515 111.4 — — — — -6 +100 — 33.8% -1.31 1–10 (9%) 3–4 (43%) 89.6 -0.05
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2002 1571 118.5 — — — — -98 +116 — 50.0% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -0.43
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2003 1496 100.4 — — — — -79 +158 — 33.3% -1.22 0–4 (0%) — — -0.08
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2004 1465 105.4 -0.90 -0.66 0.885 47.3% -55 — — 28.6% -1.71 0–2 1–0 — -0.09
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1817 131.0 -0.90 -0.66 0.885 47.3% -15 +33 -109 44.3% -0.55 44–55 (44%) 27–24 (53%) 99.7 -1.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.