H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Barbara Schett H2H: 3-3

Amy Frazier and Barbara Schett are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 Los Angeles third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #23 6-4 6-4 Barbara Schett #89 Match data
Aug 6, 2003* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Barbara Schett #54 4-6 6-4 6-4 Amy Frazier #38 Match data
Aug 6, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #59 6-4 6-4 Barbara Schett #32 Match data
Jul 30, 1999* Stanford WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #28 6-4 6-0 Barbara Schett #12 Match data
May 24, 1996* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Barbara Schett #50 6-7 6-3 6-4 Amy Frazier #21 Match data
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Barbara Schett #84 4-6 7-5 9-7 Amy Frazier #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —