H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 2-3

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 3–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–1 on carpet, while Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1997 Wimbledon second round 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #15 7-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #34 Match data
Nov 5, 1992* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #31 6-4 2-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #16 Match data
May 28, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 6-1 3-6 6-2 Amy Frazier #16 Match data
Feb 15, 1991* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Amy Frazier #15 6-3 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #75 Match data
Sep 28, 1990* Tokyo Dentsu WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #16 7-6 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7