H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amy Frazier vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1987 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-2 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amy Frazier | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |