H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 0-2

Catherine Tanvier holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1989 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1989* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Catherine Tanvier #83 6-3 6-1 Amy Frazier #39 Match data
Mar 3, 1988* Wichita WTA 250 R32 Hard Catherine Tanvier #111 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —