H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 2-5

Chanda Rubin holds a 5–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Chanda Rubin #8 6-4 6-4 Amy Frazier #51 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #29 6-4 3-6 1-0 (ret.) Chanda Rubin #28 Match data
Nov 7, 2000* Philadelphia WTA 500 R32 Carpet Chanda Rubin #11 2-6 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Jan 14, 2000* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #21 6-2 6-1 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Mar 9, 1997* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #25 6-3 4-6 7-6 Amy Frazier #31 Match data
Nov 10, 1994* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Chanda Rubin #26 6-1 6-1 Amy Frazier #14 Match data
Mar 27, 1992* San Antonio WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #22 7-5 3-6 6-1 Chanda Rubin #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —