H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Debbie Graham H2H: 6-0

Amy Frazier holds a 6–0 lead over Debbie Graham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1996 Manhattan Beach third round 7-6 2-6 7-5.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 1996* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #22 7-6 2-6 7-5 Debbie Graham #197 Match data
Sep 25, 1993* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #74 6-2 6-4 Debbie Graham #57 Match data
Feb 22, 1992* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #27 7-6(5) 6-2 Debbie Graham #39 Match data
Feb 14, 1992* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Amy Frazier #25 4-6 6-4 6-1 Debbie Graham #40 Match data
Sep 21, 1991* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #20 7-5 6-1 Debbie Graham #54 Match data
Aug 9, 1991* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #19 6-3 1-6 6-1 Debbie Graham #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Debbie Graham #729 #35 190 1,756 83 90 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Debbie Graham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1987 1–1 50.0% 1,502 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1988 3–2 60.0% #138 1,548 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1989 2–4 33.3% #256 1,512 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1990 5–4 55.6% #121 1,582 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1991 14–11 56.0% #42 1,685 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 21–19 52.5% #51 1,727 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1993 21–22 48.8% #65 1,682 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1994 8–10 44.4% #68 1,697 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1995 4–12 25.0% #131 1,598 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 4–5 44.4% #122 1,607 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8