H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Elna Reinach H2H: 1-2

Elna Reinach holds a 2–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elna Reinach leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1990 Dorado third round 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 1990* Dorado WTA 250 R32 Hard Elna Reinach #103 2-6 6-1 6-4 Amy Frazier #16 Match data
Feb 28, 1990* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #27 7-6 6-3 Elna Reinach #49 Match data
Aug 19, 1989* Albuquerque WTA 250 SF Hard Elna Reinach #57 6-2 6-2 Amy Frazier #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,865 145 170 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Elna Reinach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,670 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,636 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,812 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1992 10–16 38.5% #109 1,655 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,707 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,731 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,666 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —