H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Els Callens H2H: 2-2

Amy Frazier and Els Callens are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2003 Hobart International round of 32 6-1 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #42 6-1 5-7 6-3 Els Callens #68 Match data Jan 9, 2003* R32 Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #19 5-7 6-4 7-5 Els Callens #104 Match data Oct 31, 2000* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Els Callens #89 6-1 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Els Callens #73 3-6 2-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #26 Match data Oct 25, 1996* R16 Canadian Indoor Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Els Callens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Els Callens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 10/56 of Els Callens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Els Callens
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% 2003 4/32 3.5 6.0 58.1% 64.9% 34.7% 44.6% 62.6% 51.9% 36.5%
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% 2004 5/20 3.6 3.8 63.1% 62.0% 34.6% 39.8% 26.0% 51.9% 37.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/4 3.0 5.0 59.1% 66.7% 51.9% 0.0% 33.3% 60.6% 31.3%
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 10/211 3.5 4.8 60.7% 63.6% 36.3% 37.8% 41.4% 52.8% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Els Callens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.