H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 2-0

Amy Frazier holds a 2–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2002 Toyota Princess Cup round of 32 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #53 4-6 6-4 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #52 Match data Sep 19, 2002* R32 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amy Frazier #44 7-6(5) 6-4 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #65 Match data Jan 10, 2002* R16 Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 118 183 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 2000 13–20 39.4% #95 1,546 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,546 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,408 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 47 83 130 36.2% 59 76 135 43.7% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 32/135 of Emmanuelle Gagliardi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/48 2.2 1.0 58.2% 63.7% 37.7% 50.1% 43.2% 52.8% 41.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/26 0.6 1.6 62.8% 59.3% 46.5% 44.8% 43.3% 54.0% 36.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/25 2.6 4.0 59.1% 65.7% 44.8% 58.1% 45.5% 57.0% 42.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/24 1.3 4.2 67.0% 59.1% 40.0% 31.3% 67.4% 52.8% 42.6%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% 2007 7/11 0.4 3.1 65.3% 53.5% 47.4% 57.3% 34.3% 52.0% 37.1%
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% 2008 1/1 0.0 4.0 69.0% 57.5% 44.4% 42.9% 25.0% 53.4% 38.1%
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 32/301 1.3 3.0 63.4% 59.6% 43.2% 46.6% 47.9% 53.5% 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1995 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.03
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1996 1504 108.4 — — — — — +73 — 62.5% +0.13 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.16
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1997 1532 110.3 — — — — -57 +95 +68 47.5% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 +1.15
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1998 1498 101.3 — — — — -92 +128 — 35.7% -1.26 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +1.10
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1999 1563 123.3 — — — — — +85 +21 43.4% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.71
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 2000 1546 120.4 — — — — -122 +106 0 42.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 0.00
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 2001 1547 114.9 — — — — -78 +8 +74 42.6% -0.53 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.16
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 2002 1584 127.0 — — — — -19 -57 — 46.5% -0.13 7–8 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 -0.34
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 2003 1608 119.0 -1.11 -1.05 0.887 47.4% +3 -1 +6 49.1% -0.17 8–6 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 105.1 +1.34
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2004 1525 104.1 -0.28 -2.38 0.796 45.6% -6 +29 +75 33.9% -1.36 3–6 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.11
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2005 1506 106.9 +0.17 -1.19 0.996 50.0% -24 +72 — 38.2% -0.60 6–1 (86%) 1–3 (25%) 105.3 +0.98
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2006 1470 101.7 -2.03 -1.17 0.901 47.9% -33 +50 +92 34.6% -0.96 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 +0.09
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2007 1409 97.3 -2.52 -2.76 0.774 44.8% -23 +90 — 12.5% -2.50 1–1 — — +0.05
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 2008 1401 100.1 -0.04 -2.40 0.818 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1696 117.4 -1.31 -1.73 0.865 47.0% -33 +56 +46 41.2% -0.60 45–59 (43%) 33–33 (50%) 100.5 +1.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.