H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 1-1

Amy Frazier and Eva Pfaff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on clay, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1991 Filderstadt third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #27 6-2 6-1 Eva Pfaff #208 Match data
May 25, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Eva Pfaff #62 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #120 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Eva Pfaff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,609 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,643 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,777 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,856 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,740 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,649 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,586 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,521 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —