H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 1-1

Amy Frazier and Eva Pfaff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on clay, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1991 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #27 6-2 6-1 Eva Pfaff #208 Match data Oct 17, 1991* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Eva Pfaff #62 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #120 Match data May 25, 1988* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Eva Pfaff #420 #17 21 1,901 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Eva Pfaff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1980 12–11 52.2% 1,608 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1981 14–19 42.4% 1,632 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1982 18–22 45.0% 1,775 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1983 31–21 59.6% 1,856 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1985 9–11 45.0% #39 1,738 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,689 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Eva Pfaff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Eva Pfaff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 +47 40.0% -0.80 1–0 +0.61
15 1988 1637 125.6 +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) +0.73
16 1989 1717 128.7 +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 1977 1481 98.1 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.13
17 1990 1892 153.8 +24 -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37
18 1991 1813 142.7 +14 -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08
19 1992 1844 151.1 +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1980 1608 120.9 -1 -3 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.17
20 1993 1845 143.2 +1 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1981 1632 123.3 -25 +25 -30 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +3.33
21 1994 1904 156.1 +63 -246 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1982 1776 132.7 -157 -167 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.00
22 1995 1877 148.4 +50 -219 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1983 1856 145.3 -97 -97 -29 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.6 +1.01
23 1996 1836 148.1 +37 -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1984 1797 132.6 +13 -37 -33 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.64
24 1997 1819 152.4 +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1985 1739 120.7 +36 -86 +41 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.71
25 1998 1766 134.9 +18 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1986 1690 126.2 +52 -70 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.19
26 1999 1877 154.2 +23 -198 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1987 1744 139.8 +26 -162 +23 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.04
27 2000 1854 148.5 +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 1988 1648 121.4 +54 -103 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 +0.07
28 2001 1696 121.2 +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 1989 1587 119.6 +15 +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.75
29 2002 1758 137.9 -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 1990 1522 111.5 -4 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 +0.39
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 1991 1469 118.5 +22 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 1992 1459 103.0 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09
Career 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 1902 135.5 -11 -65 -2 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.