H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Florencia Labat H2H: 2-1

Amy Frazier holds a 2–1 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1995 Oakland third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #18 6-4 6-4 Florencia Labat #44 Match data
Oct 31, 1991* Scottsdale WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #25 6-3 6-1 Florencia Labat #55 Match data
Aug 29, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Florencia Labat #63 2-6 7-5 6-2 Amy Frazier #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —