H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 2-3

Gabriela Sabatini holds a 3–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1994 Tokyo Nichirei semifinal 6-1 6-3.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 1994* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 SF Hard Amy Frazier #18 6-1 6-3 Gabriela Sabatini #9 Match data
Nov 13, 1993* Philadelphia WTA 1000 QF Carpet Amy Frazier #53 2-6 6-3 7-5 Gabriela Sabatini #6 Match data
Nov 16, 1992 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Gabriela Sabatini #3 6-0 6-2 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Mar 18, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 QF Hard Gabriela Sabatini #3 6-0 6-1 Amy Frazier #23 Match data
Jan 17, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Gabriela Sabatini #3 7-5 6-1 Amy Frazier #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Gabriela Sabatini #56 #3 228 2,398 607 182 76.9% 1 8 2 2 14 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Gabriela Sabatini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1984 7–5 58.3% #74 1,585 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1985 48–18 72.7% #12 1,947 0 1
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1986 49–21 70.0% #9 2,023 0 2
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1987 62–16 79.5% #6 2,264 0 5
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1988 61–13 82.4% #4 2,276 0 9
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1989 58–12 82.9% #3 2,257 0 13
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1990 49–14 77.8% #5 2,231 1 15
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1991 62–11 84.9% #3 2,269 1 20
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1992 65–12 84.4% #3 2,291 1 25
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1993 51–18 73.9% #5 2,108 1 25
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1994 42–17 71.2% #7 2,055 1 26
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1995 41–16 71.9% #7 2,062 1 27
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1996 12–9 57.1% #56 1,947 1 27
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8