H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Gretchen Magers H2H: 1-0

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Gretchen Magers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1988 Los Angeles round of 16 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Gretchen Magers
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #119 6-4 7-5 Gretchen Magers #42 Match data Aug 12, 1988* R16 Los Angeles Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Gretchen Magers #433 #3 40 1,905 152 127 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Gretchen Magers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1982 4–1 80.0% — 1,608 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1983 9–6 60.0% — 1,689 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1984 8–7 53.3% #81 1,706 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1985 1–5 16.7% #3 1,644 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1986 6–8 42.9% #70 1,666 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1987 21–17 55.3% #52 1,713 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1988 31–20 60.8% #43 1,756 0 3
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1989 40–24 62.5% #29 1,891 0 4
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1990 22–19 53.7% #35 1,771 0 4
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 1991 10–15 40.0% #114 1,649 0 4
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 1992 0–5 0.0% #390 1,591 0 4
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Gretchen Magers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1982 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 22 12 34 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 19 12 31 61.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 77 58 135 57.0% 28 27 55 50.9% 30 25 55 54.5% 16 17 33 48.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Gretchen Magers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1982 1608 127.4 — — — — +80 — — 64.3% +0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.37
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1983 1690 116.7 — — — — -22 -1 — 52.8% -0.08 5–1 (83%) 0–1 — +0.82
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1984 1707 119.6 — — — — -54 — -40 51.4% 0.00 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.42
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1985 1644 103.2 — — — — — -40 — 16.7% -2.17 — — — -0.32
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1986 1667 123.6 — — — — -7 — — 40.6% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.81
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1987 1713 137.3 — — — — +20 -82 -75 56.1% +0.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1988 1757 133.2 — — — — +16 -60 -137 57.6% +0.58 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) 107.1 +2.74
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1989 1891 149.4 — — — — -10 -129 -183 58.3% +0.65 12–6 (67%) 9–8 (53%) 106.1 -1.97
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1990 1771 138.9 — — — — -17 -8 +111 53.2% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 8–3 (73%) 102.8 -1.04
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 1991 1650 122.9 — — — — +25 — +165 44.1% -0.27 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 90.1 +2.03
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 1992 1591 98.0 — — — — +23 — — 9.1% -2.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.47
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1906 140.6 — — — — +3 -59 -17 52.7% +0.20 47–40 (54%) 33–27 (55%) 106.7 -0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.