H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 3-1

Amy Frazier holds a 3–1 lead over Helen Kelesi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1991 Chicago quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Helen Kelesi
CAN Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 1991* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Helen Kelesi #24 7-5 6-3 Amy Frazier #15 Match data
Feb 25, 1989* Wichita WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #53 (w/o) Helen Kelesi #19 Match data
Nov 10, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #58 6-4 4-6 7-6 Helen Kelesi #20 Match data
Oct 27, 1988* Indianapolis WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #64 7-5 6-4 Helen Kelesi #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Helen Kelesi #755 #13 54 1,958 213 164 56.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Helen Kelesi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1985 15–15 50.0% #48 1,642 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1986 28–21 57.1% #39 1,745 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1987 22–19 53.7% #32 1,785 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1988 33–18 64.7% #19 1,848 0 2
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1989 36–18 66.7% #13 1,873 0 2
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1990 23–17 57.5% #25 1,785 0 2
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1991 26–20 56.5% #29 1,716 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1992 7–13 35.0% #128 1,633 0 2
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1993 18–13 58.1% #48 1,756 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1994 5–10 33.3% #125 1,646 0 2
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —